Skip to main content

Blog 2 - Reflections on openness in academia: Open or closed or too early to tell?

Some years ago I heard about the OER (Open Educational Resources) initiative launched by MIT (see for example https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-282j-introduction-to-astronomy-spring-2006/).  For several years after I was an avid follower of MIT's open-courseware programmes, but mostly in a casual and dilettantish sort of way.  Nevertheless I did learn a lot and it was an invaluable experience.  Recently I discovered the research reports (academic articles) published by the anthropologists and geologists who had discovered and are exploring the fossilized remains of Homo naledi, a new species of the genus Homo discovered in the Rising Star complex of caves near Johannesburg in South Africa in 2013.  These reports are all freely available in the open access journal e-life sciences (for example at https://elifesciences.org/articles/09560).  Dedicated reading of these fascinating articles can nurture the amateur anthropologist or geologist in anyone who has enough interest in this field, is determined enough and is armed with a good (online) dictionary.       


Never before has the type of information accessible through MIT or open-access journals such as e-life sciences been available so freely, so easily and so quickly.  Previously one would have had to be enrolled at MIT in order to attend lectures at one of the most prestigious institutions of its kind in the world.  Articles published in scientific journals were accessible only to subscribers or those who had access to university libraries - again usually by way of enrolment - very expensive and for most people utterly unattainable.  



The availability of this type of information in the public domain - and the opportunities it affords people all over the world - must surely, over the long term, be revolutionary?  Yet on the other hand I also don't see significant benefits accruing - and neither am I witnessing the radical transformation of academic publishing or the demise of the traditional university.  Not in the foreseeable future in any case.     



One of the most frequently raised objections to the 'free-to-air' model is that of financial viability or economic sustainability.  Pure altruism is rare and usually not sustainable over the long term.  Not-for-profit models may promote a decline of standards and academic rigour.  Sponsors and funders may also be inclined to meddle into their pet projects.  Middle-of-the-way strategies - for example where a university would offer OER or MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) programmes for reasons of self-promotion or marketing - in other words having their marketing budget subsidise their MOOC offerings - may also still raise questions of sustainability, academic freedom and conflict of interests.  



MOOC's apparently also have high drop-out rates.  Nothing wrong with that, I'd say.  Easy come and easy go, much like I approached my MIT 'studies' a few years ago.  But this brings me to the point that MOOC's are reportedly accessible mostly to students who have already studied, know how to study and are relatively self-reliant.  Those who would really benefit the most from MOOC's are also the students most likely to drop out.  As a citizen of a middle-income developing country such as South Africa with its significant divisions between the haves and the haves not - the rich and poor - I see MOOC's, perhaps organised in a public-private partnership between government and the universities - as an striking opportunity.  But intuitively I also know that the drop out rate will be huge.  What our students and scholars in SA really need are good teachers and equipped class-rooms.  However, the combination of traditional class-rooms and effective teachers together with MOOC's - a blended learning environment in other words - may present a viable, winning combination.  It is not an all-or-nothing situation.       



Arguably we are still in the midst of the long-predicted information revolution, and still too close to the action - to deep into the forest - to see the proverbial wood for the trees.  The battle for openness and freedom of information, knowledge and data will no doubt continue.  The open approach will no doubt earn its place in the sun.  But where exactly the lines between closed and open, between free and paid-for will finally be drawn it is probably too early to tell. 

Or perhaps I'm not even asking the right questions to start with?    

Sources:  
  • Weller, M., & Anderson, T. (2013). Digital resilience in higher education. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 16(1), 53.
  • Weller, M. (2014). Battle for Open: How openness won and why it doesn’t feel like victory. London: Ubiquity Press.


   

Comments

  1. I really like your example about the anthropologists' discovery. I also had thoughts about the inaccessibility of academic journals for public. This 'closeness' narrows the (already limited) reading audience of academic articles. And this questions the whole sense of reserachers' work: if they produce knowledge which is hidden from public and can't be applied by society, it brings a sad conclusion that academics do their research for the sake of research. Though, some high-rated journlas have open access, the majority are closed. I guess I just don't understand their system.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog 1 – Digital literacy and online participation – reflecting on the past two weeks

In the course of Topic 1 of the ONL172 I have already had to confront several of my own fears and phobias concerning the online world.  Here are three of them:  Fear & phobia #1:  Not connecting – total technology failure  An ever-present fear (not being a digital native – see David White’s webinar at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPOG3iThmRI&feature=youtu.be ) is not being able to connect at all – or experiencing slow and intermittent connection.  In the class-room this can be very frustrating because of the valuable time lost.  On the ONL172 course my big worry was of being irredeemably left behind and not knowing what was going on.  Connection to our group meetings was eventually solidified when we moved to Zoom.  And then there was the amazing connection I had on the day I was visiting Durban for a workshop.  In the midst of an astonishing, massive storm (see http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/in-pictures-massive-storm-wreaks-havoc-in-durban-20171010

Blog 4 - Reflections on design for online and blended learning

Over the past two weeks I have been doing quite a bit of reflection on the topic of designing and supporting for online learning.  As Varsity College, the institution that I work for, moves resolutely forward with its agenda for the promotion of teaching & learning in the online environment, I realise that it is necessary to bite the bullet and get serious about this matter as an integral and permanent part of my teaching practice.     I have already in past introduced some aspects of technology into my teaching - small things such as playing relevant YouTube videos to my Legal History students (great content there on Roman battles and Romans doing all sorts of historically important things), or exploring, together with my students, the United Nations’ online repository of international legal instruments.  Obviously some classes (subjects) lend themselves to these sort of activities more than others do.  The two subjects mentioned above lend themselves to this sort of expl

Blog 5 - Lessons learnt and future practice

What are the most important things that I have learnt on the ONL course?   Undoubtedly the value of collaboration.  Somewhat sceptical when I first started (I work most effectively by myself - or so I thought) I was astonished at the creativity unleashed once our team got to know one-another and started working collaboratively.  And I'm sure that in eight weeks we spent on this, we were only scratching the surface in this regard.  Of course, one has to overcome certain fears and uncertainties and also be prepared to share intellectual property, but the rewards could be significant.  Another important thing I learnt was the amount of tools and apps out there that are actually accessible and doable once you give it a try.  I know a little bit about these things, and have used them, but my perspective on their potential applications has changed a lot.  Twitter is one:  I've avoided Twitter because I'm mostly old school and I'd rather keep quiet than mouth off at 140